Applicant Pool Reaches Record High Despite Murray Controversy

The Emma Willard House.

Middlebury College

The Emma Willard House.


The admissions office reported in January that applicants to the college reached an all time high. With 9,230 total applications, Middlebury’s pool increased by 3.6 percent from the previous year and exceeds the previous 2013 record. 

The announcement arrived shortly before the one year anniversary of the Charles Murray incident, where “The Bell Curve” author’s lecture was met with protest from students. The incident soon drew the attention of national media outlets, thrusting Middlebury into the spotlight and invoking a national debate about free speech on campuses.

As critics of the college emerged from every ideological corner, the admissions office began evaluating the impact of the protests and the negative media coverage that followed. Beginning last spring, the office tracked three data points: withdrawals of early decision applicants, the number of campus visitors through June and yield for regular decision applicants. 

But the data collected led to an unexpected conclusion: The impacts of the Murray incident on admissions were marginal at best.

“We lost nobody who applied and was admitted early decision,” said Greg Buckles, dean of admissions. “Our regular decision yield was up just a little bit, and we had a great number of visitors. We were on track with the previous spring, which was a record year.”

Despite speculation that coveted regular decision applicants would be discouraged from accepting their admission offers, the college’s yield rate for the class of 2021 reached a five-year record high of 43 percent. 

The admissions office also hired an external consultant, who interviewed four sets of eight to ten students across the country on their perception of Middlebury, including in the surveys questions about the Murray incident.

The polling results ultimately drew two major conclusions.  For students who didn’t view Middlebury as one of their top schools, few were aware of the situation at all.  For students who favored Middlebury, the incident simply reflected the critical debate taking place on college campuses across the nation.

“The consistent response we heard, if I can sum it up, was essentially: that just sounds like what college is supposed to be — a bunch of people in lively debate and argument,” Buckles said.

Some conservative first-year students saw the incident as providing room for conversation and civil debate.

“I knew that Middlebury was a very liberal school when I applied and that being conservative here would put me in the minority,” Brendan Philbin ’21 said. “The Charles Murray incident actually made me more excited to come here, as it opened the door for many discussions about free speech on campus, a topic about which I am very passionate.”

For others, Middlebury’s qualities and opportunities eclipsed the blemish of the incident.

“I thought lightly about it, but the actions of a few rowdy individuals do not and should not reflect the viewpoints of the entire Middlebury student body,” Allan Lei ’21 said. “On top of that, Middlebury had always been one of my top choices, so I just wasn’t gonna let that overshadow my deep enthusiasm for the school.”

Incoming students are not alone in viewing the aftermath of the incident positively. Andi Lloyd, dean of the faculty, said, “At least some prospective faculty suggested that they appreciate the fact that Middlebury is actively engaging these issues — issues that are, of course, not unique to Middlebury — as hard as those conversations may be, they see it as a good thing that we are actually having them.” 

“I believe that the incidents have had, in the long run, a positive effect on our community,” Nora Bayley ’21 said. “We have used the incidents to realize flaws in our administration and governing system, and have tried to fix them to better represent our community as a whole.”

Although the Murray incident had a marginal impact on the growth of the college’s applicant pool and its reputation, the critical internal conversations have allowed Middlebury to establish itself as a leader in the broader national discussion about speech on campus. 

A committee on speech and inclusion was formed in response to the incident, and recently issued its first report and recommendations for campus change. The past fall, the faculty also launched “Critical Conversations: Advancing a Culture of Freedom and Inclusivity.”  As part of the series, the college invited a panel of scholars to discuss the creation of a robust and inclusive public sphere. In a completely different capacity, first year students were also able to navigate the topic of speech in the seminar course “Free Speech v. Racist Speech” led by Professor Erik Bleich. 

“The only way to find compromise is to listen, and I think now we’re starting to have the conversations we need to be having,” Emma Clinton ’21 said. “People are talking, the administration is listening, and hopefully that will bring change for the better.”

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

About the Writer
BOCHU DING, Information Insights Director

Bochu Ding ’21 is Information Insights Director.

He previously served as a news editor, senior writer and Community Council correspondent.

He brings...


3 Responses to “Applicant Pool Reaches Record High Despite Murray Controversy”

  1. Fred Stetson Middlebury '65 on March 2nd, 2018 8:46 am

    This article speaks well of the College, the Campus newspaper. and the author, Bochu Ding. I am curious to know how the 43 percent admissions yield rate compares to other competitive colleges, such as Princeton, Dartmouth, Amherst, Williams and Emory?

    Also, does Middlebury systematically track the careers of its graduates? In other words, while there are good admissions performance records, are there also statistical or any other records, showing the value of Middlebury College degrees? I am not sure there should be such data, but I am curious to know if it is available?

  2. Michael on March 2nd, 2018 7:51 pm

    Applications to Bowdoin saw a year-on-year increase of 25%. Colby, 14%. Bates, 45%. Middlebury, 3.6%.

    While applications to Middlebury were certainly up, the increase was unfortunately far less than that seen a comparable schools.

  3. Bochu Ding on March 3rd, 2018 5:40 pm

    Hi Michael,

    Thank you for pointing this out. This was something that I considered including in the article but found to be off topic from the central story. Thus, thank you for giving me the opportunity to expand on this.

    While writing this article, I also came across these statistics. While Middlebury’s applicant pool increases mirrored its peer NESCAC schools Hamilton’s (9%) and Tufts (2%), it certainly appears that Middlebury’s incremental increase was eclipsed by that of its primary peers: Bowdoin (25%), Bates (45%), and Colby (14%).

    This is how Dean of Admissions Greg Buckles responded to my question about the discrepancy in our recent interview:

    “It is the case that a lot of our overlap schools, peer schools, (and) competitors are investing significant resources into marketing, staffing of admissions, and enrollment strategies. I think it has a lot more to do with how (they) invested in a lot of marketing, PR, and other initiatives around that. We have not taken that approach.

    Middlebury has been known as a fairly low-key school when it comes to hardcore recruiting, and we feel that the growth we have seen with some modest investments in some campaigns, marketing, and search names, are allowing us to fine tune what we would like to do – to see incremental growth in applicants that are a good reflection. We could generate two, four, five thousand more applicants fairly quickly if we took the kinds of initiatives that work for that kind of thing, but to what end?

    We are not going to take any more students. We would like to have as large of an applicant pool as possible, but we are not going to try to artificially inflate it in a way that just pads our numbers.

    So, yes, we are traveling a bit more internationally now, we are incorporating a lot more visits with community-based organizations (and) outreach partners that we have all around the country that work with us to create more access and inclusion. We are a member of the coalition now and now offer the Coalition application – this is our first year doing that.

    But what we do not do is spend an outsized amount strictly toward marketing. And part of it is that every dollar an institution spends on marketing, print materials, and staffing is a dollar not being spent on financial aid, faculty salaries, and academic programming. By focusing on that Middlebury, we feel that we can draw attention to those strengths and still do really well.

    There are some places that are being very aggressive – they are dropping application fees, they are dropping test score requirements, they are dropping additional essays, a whole series of things that can allow them to very quickly ramp up application numbers. Ours has been steady, sustained growth that we feel serves us well.”

Navigate Left
Navigate Right
Middlebury College's only student-run newspaper.
Applicant Pool Reaches Record High Despite Murray Controversy